The Decision
The precise moment of operational choice to optimise — stated as a binary or ranked selection, not a theme.
Most enterprise AI stalls on hype-driven selection: loose metrics, vague scope, no data plan. Use the Use Case Sentence Formula and a weighted scoring model to pressure-test your project in two minutes — then download a ready-to-circulate implementation canvas.
If you can’t fill these in, it isn’t fundable yet. Watch the sentence assemble as you type.
Rate each sub-component 1–5. We average within each dimension (the Microsoft approach) to neutralise optimism bias.
Enter your business email to reveal your score, recommended autonomy level, and a downloadable implementation canvas.
No spam. We use this to follow up only if you ask. 100% on-prem deployment available.
Composite of business value (40%), feasibility (35%), and risk-adjusted score (25%).
A valid use case satisfies a strict four-part anatomy. If any part can’t be defined with empirical precision, classify it as a hypothesis — not an active initiative.
The precise moment of operational choice to optimise — stated as a binary or ranked selection, not a theme.
The sequence of actions, handoffs, and systems — including triggers, where output appears, and fallback behaviour.
The specific role or system interface acting on the output, with its constraints, incentives, and interface context.
A defined operational KPI with an established baseline and a rigorous counterfactual measurement plan.
Setting autonomy too high before controls exist is a top failure mode; too low leaves efficiency on the table.
System drafts, human drives
The system acts as a helper so a person works faster or with less cognitive strain — drafting communications or summarising cases. The human stays fully in control of the decision.
System recommends, human decides
The system provides recommendations, rankings, or scores that influence — but do not make — the human decision, such as claims triage or next-best-action guidance.
System executes under guardrails; exceptions route to humans
The system executes a decision or workflow step under predefined rules, and humans only handle the exceptions — for example automated routing of low-risk transactions.
Multi-agent dynamic execution across tools
The system plans and executes multi-step actions across tools, dynamically adapting to context and escalating only when constraints or risks are detected.
Browse 119 governed AI use cases — each tagged with its autonomy level, data triage, and ROI blueprint — or see how SEEMR routing cuts the compute cost of running them.
An AI use case framework is a disciplined way to identify, scope, and prioritise AI projects before funding them. It forces every initiative to define a specific decision, workflow, user, and measurable outcome — replacing hype-driven selection with a defensible business case. VDF AI’s framework adds a target autonomy level, a Minimum Viable Data triage, and explicit economic sizing.
Score each candidate across business value, technical feasibility, and risk, then average the sub-components (the Microsoft approach) to avoid optimism bias. Anchor it to a pre-existing metric with a historical baseline, set the target autonomy level, and pass a data-readiness gate. This tool runs that scoring for you and returns a 0–100 prioritisation score with a Prioritise / Refine / Deprioritise verdict.
A one-sentence scoping standard: “For [User], improve [KPI] using [AI capability], so that [KPI] improves from [Baseline] to [Target] within [Timeline], while meeting [Constraints].” If any part cannot be stated with precision, the initiative is a hypothesis, not a fundable use case.
Licensing and tokens are only 20–35% of true total cost of ownership. VDF AI’s Self-Evolving Model Router (SEEMR) routes each task to the smallest capable model instead of one large public LLM, cutting compute cost 40–60%, while 100% on-premise / private-cloud deployment keeps data audit-ready for the EU AI Act, GDPR, and HIPAA.