AI Compliance Repository Scanner

The AI Compliance Repository Scanner

Scan a registered GitHub repository for EU AI Act compliance risks, map each finding to the specific article it implicates — Art. 9, 10, 15, Annex IV — and emit a structured risk report with remediation actions, on infrastructure you control.

Explore VDF AI Agents
Code → ActFindings mapped to articles
Art. 9/10/15Risk, data, robustness
JSONStructured risk report
UniqueFew vendors do this at all
Maps to
Article 9Article 10Article 15Annex IVSecurityRemediation
The Code-Compliance Problem

EU AI Act risk lives in the code — where compliance teams can’t see

Risk management, data governance, and robustness obligations ultimately depend on what the code actually does. But compliance teams can’t read repositories, and engineers don’t map their findings to the EU AI Act — so the regulation and the codebase live in separate worlds.

01

Two disconnected worlds

Compliance reasons in articles; engineering reasons in code. Nobody translates between them, so risk hides in the gap.

02

Manual review doesn’t scale

Reading a repository against the EU AI Act by hand is impractical for any real codebase, let alone many.

03

Findings without context

A raw security or quality finding doesn’t tell a compliance owner which obligation it threatens.

04

Almost nobody offers this

Repository-level EU AI Act analysis is rare — most tooling stops at generic code scanning.

The VDF AI Governance Opportunity

Bridge the codebase and the regulation

Analyze

Composed Repository Analysis

Security, stack, dependencies, structure.

The scanner composes proven analyzers — security scanning, tech-stack detection, dependency analysis, code-smell detection, architecture inference, and repo mapping — to build a grounded picture of what a registered repository actually contains.

  • Security and dependency analysis
  • Tech-stack and architecture inference
  • Code-smell and quality detection
  • Whole-repo mapping
Composed
Repo Analysis

Multiple analyzers

SecurityDepsStackArchitecture

Map

Findings → EU AI Act Articles

The bridge competitors don’t have.

It maps detected issues to specific EU AI Act provisions — Article 9 risk management, Article 10 data governance, Article 15 accuracy/robustness/cybersecurity, and Annex IV documentation — so a code finding becomes a compliance signal a governance owner can act on.

Mapped
Regulation-Grounded

Code to articles

Art. 9Art. 10Art. 15Annex IV

Report

Structured Report + Remediation

Risks and suggested actions, ready to persist.

The agent emits a strict JSON report of risks with suggested remediation actions, ready to persist into your compliance system. It runs on-premise, so your source code never leaves your perimeter to be analyzed.

JSON
Actionable Report

Risks + remediation

RisksRemediationJSONOn-prem
Where it pays back

Where the repository scanner pays back

EU AI Act Code Review

Scan a repository behind a high-risk AI system and surface where the code implicates EU AI Act obligations.

Pre-Assessment Triage

Find code-level compliance gaps before a conformity assessment, mapped to the relevant articles.

Risk Register Population

Emit structured risks with remediation actions ready to persist into your compliance risk register.

Dependency & Security Compliance

Connect security and dependency findings to Article 15 robustness and cybersecurity duties.

Data-Governance Checks

Surface code signals relevant to Article 10 data-governance obligations.

Continuous Compliance

Re-scan repositories over time so code-level EU AI Act risk stays visible as systems evolve.

ROI Snapshot

What changes after rollout

Visible
Code-level Act risk surfaced
Mapped
Findings to specific articles
Actionable
Remediation, not just alerts
On-prem
Source code stays inside
FAQ

Questions about the AI Compliance Repository Scanner

What is an AI compliance repository scanner?

It is an AI governance agent that scans a registered GitHub repository for EU AI Act compliance risks, maps each finding to the specific article it implicates — Article 9, 10, 15, or Annex IV — and emits a structured JSON risk report with suggested remediation. VDF’s scanner runs on your own infrastructure so source code never leaves your perimeter.

Which EU AI Act provisions does it map to?

Article 9 (risk management), Article 10 (data governance), Article 15 (accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity), and Annex IV (technical documentation) — turning code findings into specific compliance signals.

How does it analyze the code?

It composes proven analyzers — security scanning, tech-stack detection, dependency analysis, code-smell detection, architecture inference, and repo mapping — then maps the results to the regulation. The analysis is grounded in what the repository actually contains.

Why is this capability unusual?

Most tooling stops at generic code scanning and never connects findings to the EU AI Act. Repository-level analysis mapped directly to specific articles is rare — it’s one of the most distinctive agents in VDF’s governance toolkit.

Does my source code leave my environment?

No. Deployed on-premise or in your sovereign cloud, the scan runs inside your perimeter and your code is never sent to a third party. The output is a structured report you can persist into your compliance system.

Bridge your codebase and the EU AI Act

See the AI Compliance Repository Scanner map repo findings to specific articles with remediation.