Regulatory submissions stitch together CMC, clinical, non-clinical, and labeling content. This playbook puts every document into a Living Knowledge graph and lets specialist agents draft and validate each module against agency guidance — all without sending data outside.
A regulatory submission is a knowledge graph in disguise. CMC sections cite batches. Clinical sections cite studies. Labeling cites both. Every cycle, authoring teams rebuild that web by hand. VDF AI captures it once, in a Living Knowledge graph, and lets specialist agents draft and validate each module.
An eCTD module references batches, studies, methods, and labels. Authoring teams reassemble that web by hand every cycle.
Indexed documents, extracted entities, and relationships sit in a graph. Specialist agents draft each module; a validator checks consistency. Authoring leads review and approve.
eCTD modules are documents to the regulator and graphs to the authoring team. The same batch number, study identifier, and labeling claim appear across dozens of sections. Inconsistency is the most common reason submissions are rejected at the gate.
VDF AI ingests CMC, clinical, non-clinical, and labeling content into a Living Knowledge graph with entities and relationships. Specialist agents own their sections; a Consistency Validator checks the graph for the kinds of errors humans miss at 11 PM on submission week.
VDF Data extracts entities (batches, studies, methods, products) and relationships into the knowledge graph alongside the vector index.
Each specialist owns a sub-area of the submission and follows a strict outline aligned to agency templates.
A Consistency Validator checks batch numbers, study identifiers, and dosing across drafted sections, flagging mismatches before the authoring lead sees them.
Each drafted section ships with citations to the source documents and to the agency guidance it satisfies.
Live Execution Monitoring stores every decision. SEEMR routes heavy reasoning to your high-capability private model.

authoring cycle time per module.
cross-section consistency issues caught pre-review.
proprietary CMC or clinical content leaves the perimeter.
SEEMR's Knowledge Graph mode incorporates every approved section as a future retrieval signal. Subsequent submissions start with stronger context.
No. It produces draft sections with citations. Medical writers review, edit, and own the final voice.
New guidance is ingested into the Living Knowledge graph and surfaced during drafting. Validation checks reference the latest version.
Yes — the Section Drafter Agents can compose Module 2 from Module 3, 4, and 5 content with cross-section citations.
VDF AI exposes every model, prompt, and retrieval step. That transparency is the foundation for GxP validation. The Accuracy Testing module supports IQ/OQ-style protocols.
All processing happens on-prem. Domains scope access by therapeutic area or product line. No content leaves the perimeter.
Living Knowledge captures reusable assertions (e.g., method validation). Future submissions start with stronger context.
Tell us what you’re trying to achieve—governed AI Networks, enterprise RAG, deep integrations, or on‑premise deployment. We’ll help you map the right architecture, security posture, and rollout path. If you’re moving beyond AI pilots and need scalable, auditable execution, reach out—our team is ready to help.